Biology 202
Spring, 2004
Student Course Evaluation

"a "non-traditional" science course in several respects"
(see http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro04)
and so needing feedback to "get it less wrong"

How significant did you find the course for your education generally? Give a number, from 0 (not at all significant) to 10 (very significant), and provide any additional comments you think would be helpful.




How significant did you find the course for your understanding of science and of neurobiology/behavior. Give a number, from 0 (not at all significant) to 10 (very significant), and provide any additional comments that you think would be helpful.




What was the most successful aspect of the course for your education?




What was the least successful aspect of the course for your education?




How successful for you was the lecture/discussion format? Give a number, from 0 (not successful) to 10 (very successful), and provide any additional comments that you think would be helpful.




How successful for you was the use of web materials instead of assigned readings in a textbook? Give a number, from 0 (not successful) to 10 (very successful), and provide any additional comments that you think would be helpful.




How successful for you was writing web papers instead of having examinations? Give a number, from 0 (not successful) to 10 (very successful), and provide any additional comments that you think would be helpful.




How successful for you was the course forum area? Give a number, from 0 (not successful) to 10 (very successful), and provide any additional comments that you think would be helpful.




What suggestions do you have for making the course "less wrong" in the future?




Thanks for your input. Please return this evaluation form when you turn in the hard copy of your final web paper. There will be a separate box for these forms so they can remain anonymous.
Paul Grobstein