Think before you flush or brush
Biology 103
2002 Second Paper
On Serendip
Think before you flush or brush
Sarah Tan
One of my friends from high school has made a habit of putting toilet seat lids down before she flushes. She started doing this about four years ago when she heard that when toilets are flushed, water droplets are expelled from the toilet bowl into the air, and when they land, other areas of the bathroom get "contaminated" by toilet water. That always amused me, but when I went over to her house, I humored her and followed this personal rule of hers. However, I didn't know—and chances are, she didn't know—just how justified she was in worrying about in what is known as the "aerosol effect" in toilets. My discovery that there is actually a technical term for this phenomenon was the first indication that there might be something scientifically legitimate to it. It seems to have first been brought to light by University of Arizona environmental microbiologist Charles Gerba when he published a scientific article in 1975 describing bacterial and viral aerosols due to toilet flushing (2). He conducted tests by placing pieces of gauze in different locations around the bathroom and measuring the bacterial and viral levels on them after a toilet flush, and his results are more than just a little disturbing.
First
is the confirmation of the existence of the aerosol effect, even though
it is largely unrecognized. "Droplets are going all over the place—it's
like the Fourth of July," said Gerba. "One way to see this is to put a
dye in the toilet, flush it, and then hold a piece of paper over it" (8).
Indeed, Gerba's studies have shown that the water droplets in an
invisible cloud travel six to eight feet out and up, so the areas of
the bathroom not directly adjacent the toilet are still contaminated.
Walls are obviously affected, and in public or communal bathrooms, the
partitions between stalls are definitely coated in the spray mist from
the toilet (1).
Also, toilet paper will be cleanest when it is enclosed in a plastic or
metal casing; after all, it's subject to the same droplets splattering
on it, and its proximity to the toilet bowl makes contamination
potential obvious. The ceiling is also still contaminated and is in
fact a potential problem site because it is often overlooked in the
cleaning process. Bacteria cling to ceilings and thrive in the humid
environment there; if the situation is left untreated for months or
years (as is often the case), odors remain in restrooms that seem to
have been to be otherwise thoroughly cleaned (1).
The bacterial mist has also been shown to stay in the air for at least
two hours after each flush, thus maximizing its chance to float around
and spread (2).
"The greatest aerosol dispersal occurs not during the initial moments
of the flush, but rather once most of the water has already left the
bowl," according to Philip Tierno, MD, director of clinical
microbiology and diagnostic immunology at New York University Medical
Center and Mt. Sinai Medical Center. He therefore advises leaving
immediately after flushing to not have the microscopic, airborne mist
land on you (4).
Worse still is the possibility of getting these airborne particles in
the lungs by inhaling them, from which one could easily contract a
cough or cold (6).
Obviously, the idea of toilet water being unknowingly distributed around the bathroom is less than appealing, but a study of this sort calls for looking in detail at precisely what microscopic organisms we're dealing with here, even if we don't really want to know. Put rather graphically, it can be summed up as the F3 force: Fecal Fountain Factor, compounded by the favorable temperatures for bacterial propagation in room temperature toilet water (3). Using a more scientific viewpoint, streptococcus, staphylococcus, E. coli and shigella bacteria, hepatitis A virus and the common cold virus are all common inhabitants of public bathrooms, but just because they're all over the place doesn't mean we necessarily get sick. After all, humans carry disease-causing organisms on our bodies all the times, but with healthy immune systems, the quantities in which these organisms exist is not enough to affect us, particularly with a good hand-washing after every restroom visit (4). This begs the question, however, of the number of people who actually wash their hands after going to the toilet, and more importantly, the number who wash their hands effectively. Simply rinsing one's hands under running water for a few seconds without soap, as some people do, is not effective at all. The way to ensure maximum standards of hygiene is to lather your palms, the back of your hands, in between fingers, and under fingernails for 20-30 seconds with soap and hot water; the friction will kill off the bathroom bacteria (6).
Toilet
seats have actually been determined to be the least infected place in
the bathroom because the environment is too dry to support a large
bacterial population (7).
In accordance with that theory, the underside of the seat has a higher
than average microbial population. The place in a restroom with the
highest concentration of microbial colonies in restrooms is,
surprisingly, the sink, due in part to accumulations of water where
these organisms breed freely after landing their aerial journey. While
toilets are obviously not sterile environments, they tend to not be as
bad as people think because they receive more attention and are cleaned
more often. "If an alien came from space and studied the bacterial
counts, he probably would conclude he should wash his hands in your
toilet and crap in your sink," Gerba said (2).
The alien would almost certainly not put your toothbrush in his mouth
because, with its traditional, uncovered spot in the bathroom, it is
one of the hotspots for fecal bacteria and germs spewed into the air by
the aerosol effect (5).
Understandably, the toothbrush with toilet water droplets on it is one
of the most retold horror stories to emerge from Gerba's report.
There are also greater implications from the study of the aerosol effect than simple grossness factor. Most obviously, bathrooms should be cleaned even more meticulously than before, with emphasis not just on and around the toilet, but equal emphasis on all areas of the bathroom because all areas are equally affected by the spray. Using the right cleaners is important because all-purpose cleaning solutions are not necessarily antibacterial, whereas most cleaners made specifically for restrooms are referred to as disinfectants or germicidal cleaners (1). Given that the sink area teems with bacteria, one must now be more careful about washing hands properly after walking into the bathroom for any non toilet-related purposes like washing your face and brushing teeth. Using a hair dryer can potentially be problematic in regard to bacteria counts because the effect would be largely the same as hot-air hand dryers, which actually increase the bacteria on hands by 162 percent, as opposed to paper towels, which decrease them by 29 percent (7). If you're still not convinced that bacteria exist in any significant quantities on your hands, consider that kitchen sink actually harbors the most fecal matter in the average home, carried there by unwashed hands after using the bathroom (5). A tablespoon of bleach in a cup of warm water on the offending sink will fix the situation... for the day.
To limit the scope of the aerosol effect, the simplest method is to close the lid on the toilet every time before flushing (5). This would also provide the peace of mind that while you are washing your hands for 30 seconds, microscopic, bacteria-laden water droplet will not be descending upon your person. Unfortunately, most public toilets, including the ones in Bryn Mawr's dorms, don't even have lids for that option. Besides, given the large number of people who have used the toilet before you, it probably wouldn't make much difference. After washing your hands, use a paper towel to turn off the faucet and to open the door to leave, in order to avoid being recontaminated (4). And today, get a new toothbrush and always, always keep it in the medicine cabinet or some other enclosed place after use (2).
References
(1) Janitorial Resource Center - Dr Klean.
(2) A Straight Dope Classic - Cecil's been asked.
(3) Car Talk's mailbag - People are talking back.
(4) WebMD - What can you catch from restrooms?
(5) Harvard Gazette book review - Overkill, by Kimberly Thompson
(6) When in doubt, Ask Men - What can you catch from (men's) restrooms?
(7) Sean Blair: Writer. Researcher. Editor. - Killer offices.
(8) The Atlantic Monthly - Something in the water.
Comments made prior to 2007




DR. D BROWN
j. barker and m. v. jones. 2005. To determine the level of aerosol formation and fallout within a toilet cubicle after flushing a toilet contaminated with indicator organisms at levels required to mimic pathogen shedding during infectious diarrhoea. A semisolid agar carrier containing either Serratia marcesens or MS2 bacteriophage was used to contaminate the sidewalls and bowl water of a domestic toilet to mimic the effects of soiling after an episode of acute diarrhoea. Viable counts were used to compare the numbers of Serratia adhering to the porcelain surfaces and those present in the bowl water before and after flushing the toilet. Air sampling and settle plates were used to determine the presence of bacteria or virus-laden aerosols within the toilet cubicle. After seeding there was a high level of contamination on the porcelain surfaces both under the rim and on the sides of the bowl. After a single flush there was a reduction of 2·0–3·0 log cycles cm−2 for surface attached organisms. The number of micro-organisms in the bowl water was reduced by 2·0–3·0 log cycles ml−1 after the first flush and following a second flush, a further reduction of c. 2·0 log cycles ml−1 was achieved. Micro-organisms in the air were at the highest level immediately after the first flush (mean values, 1370 CFU m−3 for Serratia and 2420 PFU m−3 for MS2 page). Sequential flushing resulted in further distribution of micro-organisms into the air although the numbers declined after each flush. Serratia adhering to the sidewalls, as well as free-floating organisms in the toilet water, were responsible for the formation of bacterial aerosols. Although a single flush reduced the level of micro-organisms in the toilet bowl water when contaminated at concentrations reflecting pathogen shedding, large numbers of micro-organisms persisted on the toilet bowl surface and in the bowl water which were disseminated into the air by further flushes. Many individuals may be unaware of the risk of air-borne dissemination of microbes when flushing the toilet and the consequent surface contamination that may spread infection within the household, via direct surface-to-hand-to mouth contact. Some enteric viruses could persist in the air after toilet flushing and infection may be acquired after inhalation and swallowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Aerosol Effect when Lid is Down
While I too agree that the toilet seat lid should be closed before flushing, how much spray still gets out when it's closed because of the gaps between the bowl and the seat and the seat and the lid. I'd love to see this tested.
toliet seat
It is just the healthy thing to do. I'm told" I have always left the seat up. My whole life. Also the bathroom was not next to the return air system of the HVAC...as the situation IS.... I am admonished for putting the seat down.? Any other suggestions how to convince it is so simple."Put the seat Down"">>>
Aerosol effect, hand dryers
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ColdandFluNews/Story?id=6519300&page=3
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ColdandFluNews/Story?id=6519300&page=4
The first page I linked to confirms many of this article's suspicions but not to as great of an effect as this article implies. The second page (also mentioned at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22463584/) is a claim that hand dryers are *not* really a bacterial concern.
Urinals
In response to Shirley's question as to whether or not we should close the toilet lid before flushing "clean" urine. Tell your partner he must admit that he knows there is fecal matter from previous toilet use still sitting in the toilet bowl. If that doesn't convince him, tell him bacteria such as E. coli can live in "clean" urine(see bladder infections). Blood can also be found in "clean" urine. Even if urine really was harmless, men's bathrooms also have toilets without lids: when flushed, that bacteria flies to the urinals and then flies off the urinals when those are flushed. Hopefully, someday, there will be a law requiring that public places add lids...statistics on colds/infection would decline immensely, if people actually use them.
toilet contamination
As a nurse, I will tell her partner that Yes, urine is sterile UNTIL it leaves the body. As it passes the outside of the urethra/ body, contaminants are picked up. He needs to try the dye test........he will be convinced.
Toilet Flush Aerosol Effect
Thank you for posting this informative report on what happens when the toilet is flushed! I've been trying to convince my kids of this for years.
Some of this information
Some of this information that I read from this article looks false and looks as if a non-Christian was in on some of it.
sometimes a tiny fecal matter remains in a toilet bowel.
At the kitchen and bathroom sink, leave Comet on it. Other than fungi with it, don't rub it off. It continues to sanitize those areas.
Bathing is more practical than showering.
non Christian?
Exactly what does being Christian or non Christian have to do with putting the lid down on a toilet?
Response to Shirley King / Think before you flush or brush
Regarding the toilet lid being down before flushing - regardless of if it was urine or faeces, it should be down. Yes, urine is "clean" but there is likely to be faecal remnants in the bowl prior to urinating. Yes urinals are not covered - but who craps in a urinal???
Post new comment