The Language Instinct

PS2007's picture
Book Commentary


        This semester I read the book The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language by Steven

Pinker, a professor of Psychology at Harvard University.  This book explores the idea that language is innate. 

In other words he believes that all humans possess “the instinct to learn, speak, and understand language”

(pg. 3).  Pinker argues that language is biological, and that even without formal training children will develop

ways to communicate. He believes that language is an evolutionary adaptation that developed because

humans needed a system of communication.  

        I think that this book is a good companion to the course “Neurobiology and Behavior” for many different

reasons.  The main reason is that this book is not hard to read.  Pinker writes for a diverse audience with

varying degrees of scientific knowledge.  He is very good at explaining his ideas and providing several

examples.  The second reason is that, as Pinker asserts in his introduction, language is an extremely

interesting topic.  It is difficult to read this book without becoming excited about language.  Pinker is

passionate about this subject, and you can tell he enjoyed writing the book.  He reminds you throughout the

book that language is an amazing ability.  We can use language to relate experiences and cause others to

have specific thoughts. Language is a huge part of what separates us from other creatures, and is a definitive

part of the human experience.  

        Each chapter in the book is devoted to an aspect of language, which would make this an easy book to

read part of in a large class.  In one chapter he discusses how language develops in infants.  In another, he

writes about the biological and evolutionary aspects of language. He also included a chapter discussing the

variation of languages and how language changes across time and culture. Each chapter could easily be read

on it’s own, but together they tell a very plausible story about how and why language develops.  Pinker also

devotes part of the book to myths or popular ideas about language that are incorrect, and takes the time to

explain how these beliefs may have developed and why they are untrue.  At the end of the book he also

includes a glossary of terms, which I found very helpful.  

        I also thought it added a lot to the book that Pinker cited his own research, and the research of other

linguists and psychologists to lend credibility to his theories.  It was interesting to read about specific studies

he had completed, and what he learned from each one.  As a person very interested in scientific research, I

found this fascinating.

        One reason this book might not be very good to read in the course “Neurobiology and Behavior” is that

there was not a lot of hard science.  Most of what Pinker discusses is theoretical, although when he writes

about complex biological topics he is very clear and easy to understand.  Pinker also does not leave room for

debate.  He believes that his view on language is the right answer, and that no one should challenge his

beliefs.  This seems to clash with the basic philosophy of the course, which is that there is no right answer

and that everything should be questioned.  

        Even though the book did have some flaws, overall I really enjoyed reading it and would recommend

the book to anyone interested in understanding more about language.  Even if you do not think you are

interested in language, reading this book will change your mind.  A lot of non-fiction books are very dry, but

Pinker writes as if he is having a conversation with you.  He even uses examples from popular culture when

explaining his ideas.  After finishing the book, I may not have agreed with all of Pinker’s ideas but I was very

entertained while reading it and I feel like I gained a lot of knowledge in doing so.  I definitely plan on reading

Pinker’s others books over the summer.  

References

Pinker, Steven.  The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language.  New York: HarperCollins: 1995.




























Comments

Serendip Visitor's picture

Maurice F Prout

Hmm, great blog post!
I think there must be some limits set by Psychologists, limits beyond which if a criminal is tortured must be interrogated under law.
The human brain has certain limits for bearing pain; once that limit is crossed the brain can start malfunctioning.
SO, there is an urgent need from Psychologists to set limits -- beyond which, no interrogation team should be allowed to torture the criminal.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
randomness