<![endif]-->
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:1;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;
mso-header-margin:36.0pt;
mso-footer-margin:36.0pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<![endif]-->
Flowers for Algernon is
science fiction with one central concern – human behaviour and development of
the brain.
Daniel Keyes describes an
experiment designed by psychologists at a fictional college, Beekman College
that aims to artificially increase intelligence. Emboldened by the success of
their experiment in a mouse (Algernon) they want to test it on humans. Charlie
Gordon, an adult with an IQ of 68, is their human subject for the experiment.
The book is laid out entirely in the form of Progress Reports Charlie maintains
in a journal, and the reader joins Charlie’s journey from slow and retarded to
a genius with an IQ of 185 and back to his former intelligence when it
regresses (and the experiment fails). Although fictional, the book has a lot to
teach with regards to human behaviour and development of the brain.
As it is presented in journal
format, the book lets a reader follow through every step of Charlie’s
development. The stages of development that Charlie goes through are very
similar to that of human beings moving from young children to teenagers and
then adults. At first his brain is immature but after the surgery his progress
begins. In this book, intelligence is equated with overall maturation of the
brain. In life, we tend to do that too, where overall intelligence is used to
judge even emotional and social maturity. Yet, there exist savants and other
gifted people who demonstrate high intelligence levels but may be socially and
emotionally equivalent to others far below their age.
One realises at the beginning with
the complete lack of spelling and punctuation rules that Charlie is retarded.
His speech is like that of a small child. He admits it is hard for him to learn
and it is hard to retain information. He takes most things entirely literally
and is incapable of imagination. Soon after he undergoes the surgery that is
designed to increase his intelligence (that he says was done while he was
asleep), the changes in him become apparent through his progress reports. The
first sign of a development is his asking questions. He stops to accept
everything just the way it is, and questions authority, expressing a more
invested interest in what’s going on around him. Instead of just doing what
Professor Nemur, the head of the experiment, asks of him, he wants to know why
he should do it. He then begins to form an opinion.
Soon after, he begins to use a
dictionary to look up meanings of words he doesn’t understand. He also uses a
dictionary to spell words right. In an effort to improve his language further,
he learns the use of punctuation, and even though the first time he just uses
all of the punctuation marks that exist anywhere and everywhere, he corrects
that in his next progress report and is able to use punctuation correctly.
He then begins to develop certain
more complex human emotions. We realise that embarrassment, anger and suspicion
are emotions that take a while to develop. He expresses a need for privacy when
his intelligence begins to rise further. He is not comfortable with the idea
that all his inner thoughts are available for scrutiny in the journal. He is
demystified with the image he had created of Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss. He
begins to see them as normal human beings who are just trying to get what they
want, as opposed to geniuses with superhuman powers.
Soon after he starts to think of
religion, and what God means. God is no longer the ultimate unquestionable good
force of the world. He wonders what it all really stands for. As his
development brings him at par with a mature adult of his age, he begins to
develop romantic feelings for Alice Kinnian, his special education teacher at
the Beekman School for Retarded Adults. As his
intelligence increases, he begins to develop arrogance and impatience towards
mediocrity.
The experiment is conducted first
on Algernon, and Keyes shows us that both the human and the mouse test subjects
demonstrated the same results. Both Algernon and Charlie become significantly
more intelligent, and both regress at a fast pace. The similarity in their
mammalian nervous systems probably ensured this. Yet, the list of changes for
Charlie was much longer and more complex, as just discussed.
Keyes asserts and demonstrates the
vital and separate existences of the subconscious and the conscious mind. He
acknowledges that they are like two different minds and one doesn’t acknowledge
to the other what it is doing. Through dreams and recollections he has in the
course of the book, Charlie Gordon’s repressed subconscious speaks out and he discovers
a lot about his childhood and his family. Sometimes he has a dream that is a
sort of replay of an event, while at other times he ‘remembers’ some disjointed
events and images to employ a method of free association to make sense of it. The
largely traumatic nature of these dreams and memories are evident, and one can
tell why they have been repressed. The subconscious is always working, and by
the use of certain tapes and devices, Nemur makes sure that Charlie’s keeps
delivering answers. Keyes makes use of a lot of Freudian ideas here, with the
return of the repressed. He also deals with issues of sex and sexuality through
these repressed memories. It turns out that they are therapeutic after all.
The book seems to critic common
personality tests such as the Rorschach inkblot test and the Thematic
Apperception Test. These tests draw on responses given by the patient, which
could be randomly or deliberately chosen, to arrive at character assessment.
With an IQ of 68, all Charlie can see in the Rorschach test is that someone
spilled ink on paper. That really is what it is, yet we look for answers and
clues hidden in them. When his IQ reaches above 100, Charlie is able to see
bats and old ladies in the cards. Our brains are constantly trying to fill
gaps, to form a whole story, to develop a missing link. Given that these tests
mainly rely on a fundamental characteristic of the human brain, they cannot be
completely written off, but the way they are presented in the book, some of the
criticism that has been present for them revisits us. They are arbitrary set of
pictures and patterns. The pictures used in TAT are old and haven’t seen much
change since the test was developed in the 1930s by () at Harvard.
The book makes us think of the
great stress and importance that we as a society and its people give to
intelligence. All Charlie really wants is that he can be friends with Gimpy,
Frank, Joe Carp and the others at the bakery he works in. He knows that he can
only be friends with them when he can read, write and join in their
conversations that discuss politics and religion. The paradox of that stress is
also presented – Charlie is ridiculed when he is retarded, but he is alienated
and ignored when he turns into a genius. Perhaps a more accurate statement then
would be that our society plays lays great stress on normalcy or behaviour that
falls within a set average. Keyes shows us how mediocrity is celebrated in the
bakery.
The need for Joe Carp et al to
humiliate Charlie at several instances makes me wonder about the human tendency
of meanness and a hierarchical structure that is established in most social
interactions and settings where the weaker are picked upon. While it is natural
for the weaker to lose out in a situation involving limited resources, a lot of
bullying is done mainly for the satisfaction (if there is any) that the bully
gains from it. Meanness is inherent in our nervous system. In a student paper
on serendip, the neurobiological basis for meanness is described as -. Meanness
is a part of a nueral network that also includes empathy, kindness and other
useful virtues. Hence, it is not possible to completely get rid of it. Is there
a positive outcome of meanness? Does it make the bullied strive to be better?
Is that chain of thought completely inhumane?
Other parts of Charlie’s character
that develop as his intelligence peaks are selfishness, arrogance and a big
ego. Miss Kinnian comments on how the earlier Charlie was much more likable.
Charlie seems to lose his old ‘heart’ as his brain acquires more. Towards the
end of the book, the Charlie from before the surgery gets into a struggle for
control over (their) life. Is it a trade-off - talent or ingenuity for modesty?
Why does that trend hold true for a significantly large proportion of the human
population?
Flowers for Algernon is thought-provoking,
and touching at multiple levels. Keyes’ work is commendable, for the insight he
provides into human behaviour.
<!--[if gte mso 9]>
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-IN
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]>
<![endif]-->
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.MsoHeader, li.MsoHeader, div.MsoHeader
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-link:"Header Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
tab-stops:center 207.65pt right 415.3pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.MsoFooter, li.MsoFooter, div.MsoFooter
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-link:"Footer Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
tab-stops:center 207.65pt right 415.3pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.HeaderChar
{mso-style-name:"Header Char";
mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-locked:yes;
mso-style-link:Header;
mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;}
span.FooterChar
{mso-style-name:"Footer Char";
mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-locked:yes;
mso-style-link:Footer;
mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;
mso-header-margin:35.4pt;
mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<![endif]-->
References
Keyes, Daniel. Flowers for
Algernon . Mariner Books, 2005.
normalcy and meanness?
Could that be the source of "meanness"?
Post new comment