Science as Story Telling: Issues Arisen and Arising

Paul Grobstein's picture

Notes and forum related to discussion at a Tri-co Science Studies Group meeting, 16 November 2010

 

Starting place:

Paul Grobstein (2005) Revisiting science in culture: science as story telling and story revising.  Journal of Research Practice 1 (1), Article M1    http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/9/17

Issues:

  • A need to clarify and/or alter the term "story"?

cf The Story of Science (updated lecture notes) and Science as Storytelling or Story Telling

  • A need to clarify/strengthen the irrelevance of "mirror of nature" approach and of Popper's "reality" as necessary ingredient?
  • A need to clarify/strengthen/expand on "generativity" as alternative essential criterion for science while remaining in spirit of "no truth"?
  • A need to clarify/expand on relationship to the "demarcation problem"?  Argument is/should be about science or about inquiry with science as subset?

cf Adventures to the stars: telling tales of science and art and Science as story telling: its relevance to history

  • A need to clarify/expand on science as "professional activity" as opposed to something engaged in by all people?

Engagement with "non-human" entitities/forms of interaction?
Commitment to maximizing "objectivity," ie widely shared stories?
Acceptance of need to invest time/energy in procedures/language aimed at that?
Unusual commitment to skepticism, including self-skepticism, unusual tolerance for uncertainty?

 

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
randomness