Pris & the Defintion of "Human"
PRIS ASKS:
"Human is not a fixed concept, but a construction constantly under challenge and revision" (cited in Hayles's How We Think).
Attached is a pdf of my paper!
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| GIST PAPER 2.pdf | 765.11 KB |
PRIS ASKS:
"Human is not a fixed concept, but a construction constantly under challenge and revision" (cited in Hayles's How We Think).
Attached is a pdf of my paper!
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| GIST PAPER 2.pdf | 765.11 KB |
| This paper reflects the research and thoughts of a student at the time the paper was written for a course at Bryn Mawr College. Like other materials on Serendip, it is not intended to be "authoritative" but rather to help others further develop their own explorations. Web links were active as of the time the paper was posted but are not updated. |
Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)
© Serendip 1994 - All rights reserved.
Comments
not for long?
Pris's view of machine and human worlds (The Blade Runner" is on my all-time top-ten list of movies by the way) intrigued me. I was especially drawn to her observation of the parity of machines and humans as being essentially patterned information. Her agreement with the assertion that identities in both cases are in fact defined by informational patterns. Whether silicon or carbon, our "me, myself, and I's" are essentially just patterned bits. The hierarchy of humans over machines then is rightly questioned by this engaging replicant, and perhaps will not be the case for long.
Post new comment