I didn't go into the woods this Monday morning, when I was spending the time curled up cozily in my apartment in Center City, watching the news of the "Frankenstorm," the "monster" Sandy, puzzling over the disconnect between my "hurrication" and the media description of the disaster swirling around me. Ever since mturer put the problematics of representation  back on the table (naming hurricanes to make them less threatening?), and froggies315 provided that "awesome" windmap for comparison with the wierd music videos  the Weather channel was using for their live coverage, I've been thinking about ecological literacy (okay, well, just thinking about it more pointedly), wondering what more responsible reporting might look-and-sound like.
I may have found one example in this morning's NYTimes : it's about the enormous oyster beds, built up over 7000 years and now entirely depleted, that once formed underwater reefs around the shores of New York, creating "undulation and contour on the harbor bottom that broke up wave action before it could pound the shore with its full force. Beds closer to shore clarified the water through their assiduous filtration...this allowed marsh grasses to grow, which in turn held the shores together with their extensive root structure."
Having destroyed all that, NYorkers made themselves more vulnerable to storm surges like the one that hit the city last night...
I look forward to returning to the woods next week, and attending to what difference weather has made in the interim.