Welcome
Welcome to Serendip! Glad you stopped by.
Looking for "the answer" to a question? There are plenty of websites out there which will tell you what to think. Serendip instead aims at helping you to think for yourself, and in the process of discovery to formulate new questions and new explorations.
Nothing on Serendip is "authoritative", but there is lots here that you can learn from and contribute to. See (and click on) the material below and to the right for recently added discussions. Click here for publishing guidelines.
What's New
- Mental Health and the Brain: Topic Suggestions
- Mental Health and the Brain: Books
- Mental Health and the Brain: Home Page
- Biology of Learning
- Reading Three Guineas
- Grant Proposal for Interactive Interdisciplinary Inquiry Institute
- Archive of Class Notes
- Notes for Day 2
- Course Roster
- Notes for Day 1
- Choices and Constraints: How We Decide
- Behavioral Health: Military and Veteran's Issues
- My Reflections on Summer 2008
- Three Summer Science Institutes 2008
- Science as Inquiry Critique 2008
- Brain and Behavior Summer Fun Next Year's Learning
- Science and Knowledge
- The rebirth of American pragmatism/non-foundationalism
- Grant Request
- The Three Doors of Serendip: "Hands on" Understanding
- The Three Doors of Serendip: "Experimental Understanding"
- The Three Doors of Serendip
- The Three Doors of Serendip: "Rational" Understanding
- Mental Health
- From The Inside
Who We Are
Life is not really so difficult if you just follow the instructions.
|
2318 visitors so far today
Featured Content
Links to Spring 2008 Courses
The "objectivity"/"subjectivity" spectrum:
having one's cake and eating it too?
by Paul Grobstein
4 December 2007
An interesting issue came up in my college seminar course today. Supposing one accepts that absolute "objectivity" is not achievable, ie that all understandings are "stories" that inevitably have a personal context dependence (some "subjectivity") to them. And one notices that many people are more attracted to stories with a personal element to them than they are to the "dry" stories told by scientists/academics. If absolute objectivity is unachievable, is there any rationale for putting up with (even aspiring) to "dryness", ie for preferring more objective stories to less objective things? for teaching students the virtues of trying to be more "objective"?
I think there in fact is but that it doesn't any longer lie along the obvious path of asserting that dryness is needed to get one to "Truth" or "Reality" .... those notions necessarily go out the window along with a recognition that the context-free view is not achievable. One needs instead to approach the matter from a different direction. Some thoughts about that direction ...
A Visit with Susan Stryker
by Anne Dalke and Critical Feminist Studies
11 October 2007
I think queer means valuing that which is off-center and against the norm... being queer means you have some consciousness about norms, and how they are produced-- often through violence and suppression of difference--if you are queer you are aware of where your boundaries are, and when you cross them..and you celebrate your differences and uniqueness.
Links to Fall 2007 Courses
Paths to Story Telling as Life:
Fellow Traveling with Richard Rorty
by Paul Grobstein
2 July 2007
I first encountered Richard Rorty's work rather late in both our lives. Having done so, I regret never having met him and, with his death on 8 June 2007, the loss of the chance ever to do so. Perhaps though its all for the best. Following a quite different path, I found myself in interesting places that Rorty too had reached. That different people can get to a place in different ways, and in the absence of any direct connection with one another, provides reassurance that there is some kind of a meaningful there there. And a reason to share stories both about how one got there and where one might explore next.
